KLITIKS BERMAKNA NUMERIK DALAM BAHASA INDONESIA
Abstract
This study examines bound morphemes with numerical meanings in the Indonesian language, focusing on how the language accommodates numerical and quantitative concepts in forming efficient vocabulary. The main challenge lies in finding an appropriate mechanism to convey stable numerical meanings without altering the fundamental structure or word classes. However, the mechanisms by which numerical morphemes are used remain poorly understood, particularly in terms of their semantic stability and contribution to technology- and culture-based vocabulary. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method to explore the functions and structures of numerical morphemes such as bi- (two), tri- (three), and panca- (five) within the morphological context of the Indonesian language. Data were sourced from the Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). The findings reveal that bound numerical morphemes play a significant role in conveying quantitative information and serve as a tool for lexical development without altering the base word's class. Additionally, prefixes such as mega- and giga- enable Indonesian to align with internationally common terminology in scientific domains while retaining its agglutinative nature. These bound numerical morphemes offer an effective and flexible linguistic mechanism to support vocabulary development relevant to modern communication needs, balancing global integration with cultural identity preservation.
References
Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UT1R55Bj-yIC
Anderson, S. R., & Wackernagel, J. (1993). Wackernagel’s Revenge: Clitics, Morphology, and the Syntax of Second Position. Linguistic Society of America, 69(1), 68–98.
Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2011). What is Morphology? Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bolGMMyZVjMC
Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2022). What is morphology? John Wiley & Sons.
Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Georgetown University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=I7efQgAACAAJ
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chaer, A. (2014). Linguistik umum. Rineka cipta.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Denistia, K., & Baayen, R. H. (2022). The morphology of Indonesian: Data and quantitative modeling. In The Routledge Handbook of Asian Linguistics (1st Edition). Routledge.
Haspelmath, Martin, Sims, & Andrea D. (2010). Understanding Language Series Series Editors: Bernard Comrie and Greville Corbett (2nd Edition). Routledge.
JWM, V. (1996). Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Keraf, G. (1984). Linguistik Bandingan Historis. Gramedia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CrktAAAAMAAJ
Lieber, R. (2016). Introducing Morphology. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=l853CgAAQBAJ
Marsono. (1998). Morfem Tindakan Bahasa Jawa dalam Perbandingan dengan Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Daerah yang Lain. Humaniora, 10(1). https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/612/402
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Musgrave, S. (2001). Non-subject Arguments in Indonesian. University of Melbourne, Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ZdzbNQAACAAJ
Noer, Z., & Dayana, I. (2021). Buku Sains Dasar. Guepedia.
Nugraha, D. S. (2024). Analyzing the Derivational Verb of Indonesian Based on the Derivational Morphology. South Asian Research Journal of Arts, Language and Literature, 6(01), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjall.2024.v06i01.001
Ramlan, M. (1987). Morfologi: Suatu Tinjauan Seskritif. Karyono.
Ryding, K. C. (2014). Introduction to Arabic morphology. In Arabic (pp. 41–54). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139151016.006
Sneddon, J. N., Adelaar, K. A., Djenar, D., & Ewing, M. (2012). Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.
Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological theory: An Introduction to Word structure in Generative Grammar. In Generative Grammar. Basil Blackwell. Basill Blackwell.
Spencer, A., & Zwicky, A. M. (2001). The Handbook of Morphology. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xrdbNnbufqAC
Stake, R. (1995). Case study research. Springer.
Suleimanov, D. S., Gilmullin, R. A., Fridman, A. Y., & Mukhamedshin, D. (2024). Semantic Models of Agglutinative Languages. 2024 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Problems of Informatics, Electronics and Radio Engineering (PIERE), 1930–1935.
Ulfah, A. K., Razali, R., Rahman, H., Ghofur, A., Bukhory, U., Wahyuningrum, S. R., Yusup, M., Inderawati, R., & Muqoddam, F. (2022). Ragam Analisis Data Penelitian (Sastra, Riset dan Pengembangan). IAIN Madura Press.
Wijana, I. D. P. (2021). Informal Bound Morphs in Indonesian. Jurnal Bastrindo, 2.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Zaim, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. Sukabina Press.
Zimmer, K. E. (1964). Affixal Negation in English and Other Languages. William Clowes. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TsmCtgAACAAJ
Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K. (1983). CLITICIZATION VS. INFLECTION: ENGLISH N’T.
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.